Sunday, March 21, 2004
SOCIAL EXPERIMENT:
Those liberal elitist ivory tower political scientists always complain that they can't test their "theories" in the real world. The only good thing about San Francisco's recent month of "marriages" is that we can now see the DATA about the 4,037 "couples" who got "licenses". This confirms my own suspicion about who the real villains are behind this anti-capitalistic assault on the manufacturers of closet doors. G. K. Chesterton had already pointed them out in The Man Who Was Thursday. "Thieves respect property. They merely wish the property to become their property that they may more perfectly respect it. ... Bigamists respect marriage, or they would not go through the highly ceremonial and even ritualistic formality of bigamy. But philosophers despise marriage as marriage."
Those same sex "couples" are just like the bigamists, with a distorted "respect" for weddings, or at least for wedding gowns. They were only unwitting tools being manipulated by our old enemies on the campuses. The proof? "68.8 percent held at least a college degree" and another 19% had "some college". More than six out of seven had been exposed to the indoctrination of our liberal universities. I think we know just which schools those were. How many of those "similar pairs" (as the figure skating world calls such unaesthetic same gender couplings) went to good private religious institutions like Regent University or Bob Jones University?
The solution to this leftist brainwashing is obvious. We should end all taxpayer funding of higher "education". It looks like Our Noble Leader is making a first step to this goal. "The Bush administration is proposing to redirect three financial aid programs that disproportionately benefit some of the wealthiest private colleges in New England. The move would shift tens of millions of dollars away from the region and toward the Sun Belt." Read about it at "Shift eyed in aid for N.E. colleges".
Though a good beginning, this does not go far enough. Privatize them completely, and leave post-high school studies in the hands of the churches -- or at least, of our conservative churches. Frankly, that means the only schools we can trust are the ones mocked by liberals as "Bible colleges". Even the Catholic universities can not be trusted. Too many of them suffer from the virus of Thomistic Aristotelian "logic", which subverted the dogmatic Augustinian truths of medieval times. That challenge to traditional unquestioned faith, originated by those openly homosexual ancient Greeks, was injected back into Europe by translations from Arabic texts. Clearly this was an early radical Muslim attempt at revenge for their losses in the Crusades.
But there is even more frightening news in the report from Sodom on the Bay. The "Same-sex marriage demographics" CHART shows a "Gender breakdown" (an obvious Freudian slip) of 57% Lesbian, 42% Gay, and "0.3% Unknown". Does this mean there were 24 people who couldn't tell what organs they had, or does it mean something even worse? Were the warnings of Senator Santorum correct? Could this be a dozen couples who were not only cross dressers, but cross species as well? Do we need to require both participants in weddings to have only two feet?
Those liberal elitist ivory tower political scientists always complain that they can't test their "theories" in the real world. The only good thing about San Francisco's recent month of "marriages" is that we can now see the DATA about the 4,037 "couples" who got "licenses". This confirms my own suspicion about who the real villains are behind this anti-capitalistic assault on the manufacturers of closet doors. G. K. Chesterton had already pointed them out in The Man Who Was Thursday. "Thieves respect property. They merely wish the property to become their property that they may more perfectly respect it. ... Bigamists respect marriage, or they would not go through the highly ceremonial and even ritualistic formality of bigamy. But philosophers despise marriage as marriage."
Those same sex "couples" are just like the bigamists, with a distorted "respect" for weddings, or at least for wedding gowns. They were only unwitting tools being manipulated by our old enemies on the campuses. The proof? "68.8 percent held at least a college degree" and another 19% had "some college". More than six out of seven had been exposed to the indoctrination of our liberal universities. I think we know just which schools those were. How many of those "similar pairs" (as the figure skating world calls such unaesthetic same gender couplings) went to good private religious institutions like Regent University or Bob Jones University?
The solution to this leftist brainwashing is obvious. We should end all taxpayer funding of higher "education". It looks like Our Noble Leader is making a first step to this goal. "The Bush administration is proposing to redirect three financial aid programs that disproportionately benefit some of the wealthiest private colleges in New England. The move would shift tens of millions of dollars away from the region and toward the Sun Belt." Read about it at "Shift eyed in aid for N.E. colleges".
Though a good beginning, this does not go far enough. Privatize them completely, and leave post-high school studies in the hands of the churches -- or at least, of our conservative churches. Frankly, that means the only schools we can trust are the ones mocked by liberals as "Bible colleges". Even the Catholic universities can not be trusted. Too many of them suffer from the virus of Thomistic Aristotelian "logic", which subverted the dogmatic Augustinian truths of medieval times. That challenge to traditional unquestioned faith, originated by those openly homosexual ancient Greeks, was injected back into Europe by translations from Arabic texts. Clearly this was an early radical Muslim attempt at revenge for their losses in the Crusades.
But there is even more frightening news in the report from Sodom on the Bay. The "Same-sex marriage demographics" CHART shows a "Gender breakdown" (an obvious Freudian slip) of 57% Lesbian, 42% Gay, and "0.3% Unknown". Does this mean there were 24 people who couldn't tell what organs they had, or does it mean something even worse? Were the warnings of Senator Santorum correct? Could this be a dozen couples who were not only cross dressers, but cross species as well? Do we need to require both participants in weddings to have only two feet?
